{"id":173,"date":"2018-02-19T11:33:36","date_gmt":"2018-02-19T10:33:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/?p=173"},"modified":"2018-02-19T11:39:42","modified_gmt":"2018-02-19T10:39:42","slug":"kant-and-the-internet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/kant-and-the-internet\/","title":{"rendered":"Kant and the Internet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-174 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2018\/02\/256px-Immanuel_Kant_portrait-240x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"240\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2018\/02\/256px-Immanuel_Kant_portrait-240x300.jpg 240w, http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2018\/02\/256px-Immanuel_Kant_portrait-230x288.jpg 230w, http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2018\/02\/256px-Immanuel_Kant_portrait.jpg 256w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 240px) 100vw, 240px\" \/>Let&#8217;s ask an &#8220;expert&#8221;. What would Immanuel Kant say about the Internet?<br \/>\nMarkus Gabriel Interview: <b>Kant und das Internet<\/b><span style=\"display: inline !important; float: none; background-color: transparent; color: #333333; cursor: text; font-family: Georgia,'Times New Roman','Bitstream Charter',Times,serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;\"> : Aufkl\u00e4rung braucht Zeit &#8211; und die fehlt im Netz<\/span> (Kant and the Internet: Enlightenment takes time &#8211; and the Internet lacks it)<br \/>\nFlorian Felix Weyh: <b>DigiKant oder: Vier Fragen, frisch gestellt<\/b> (DigiKant or: Four questions, freshly asked)<!--more--><span style=\"display: inline !important; float: none; background-color: transparent; color: #333333; cursor: text; font-family: Georgia,'Times New Roman','Bitstream Charter',Times,serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;\">Markus Gabriel <\/span><strong>Interview: Kant und das Internet : Aufkl\u00e4rung braucht Zeit &#8211; und die fehlt im Netz , in: FAZ <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.faz.net\/aktuell\/feuilleton\/debatten\/digitales-denken\/interview-kant-und-das-internet-aufklaerung-braucht-zeit-und-die-fehlt-im-netz-1912940.html\"><strong>http:\/\/www.faz.net\/aktuell\/feuilleton\/debatten\/digitales-denken\/interview-kant-und-das-internet-aufklaerung-braucht-zeit-und-die-fehlt-im-netz-1912940.html<\/strong><\/a><strong> \u00a0<\/strong><span style=\"display: inline !important; float: none; background-color: transparent; color: #333333; cursor: text; font-family: Georgia,'Times New Roman','Bitstream Charter',Times,serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;\">01.02.1010<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Gabriel sees the Internet in Kant&#8217;s sense as an tool of enlightenment.<br \/>\n&#8220;What you do at Google is easy to understand with Kant. This is where information is filtered. Just as under Kant&#8217;s conditions you have an infinitely large pool of information, we call it with Kant the &#8220;thing in itself&#8221;. But this information pool is not directly accessible, there is a logical form in between, that would be Google search in this case.<br \/>\nUnlike Kant&#8217;s epistemology, however, we at Google see what is independent of these filters as an ideology-prone accumulation of random decisions. Though the Internet certainly has ding-it-yourself qualities &#8211; it is anonymous, unrecognizable, unmanageable &#8211; but we know that in the background there are ideological forces.&#8221;<br \/>\nThe Page Rank algorithm, although ideologically shaped, was extremely sympathetic as a mathematical construct Kant.<br \/>\nKant &#8220;, the window metaphoric on the Internet would have been familiar. He would have seen in him a complex copy of the entire rational structure: We have a sensuality, i. e. information input, we have understanding, rules and we have reason &#8211; whereby reason in Kant&#8217;s sense would correspond to the holding together of different sources of information. It comes into play when I ask myself: do I use Google, or do I take up another offer? Reason comes into play in the overview of the diversity of the Internet and the choice between different options.&#8221;<br \/>\nIn principle, the Internet is suitable as an tool of enlightenment. The essential criterion of enlightenment, however, is &#8220;self-transparency&#8221;: the responsibility lies with the judge himself, who must understand the reasons for his judgment and defend it himself. However, the judge can get into an &#8220;overtaxing situation&#8221; due to the Internet.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 90px;\"><em><strong>Let us summarise the result: After that, it would therefore be sufficient to increase the judge&#8217;s media competence. But that&#8217;s the problem right now: most internet users are satisfied with the search results and consider their media competence to be sufficient due to the positive results of simple factual research.<\/strong> <\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"display: inline !important; float: none; background-color: transparent; color: #333333; cursor: text; font-family: Georgia,'Times New Roman','Bitstream Charter',Times,serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;\">Florian Felix Weyh: <\/span><strong>DigiKant oder: Vier Fragen, frisch gestellt, in: Deutschlandfunk <\/strong><span style=\"display: inline !important; float: none; background-color: transparent; color: #333333; cursor: text; font-family: Georgia,'Times New Roman','Bitstream Charter',Times,serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;\">28.02.2016 <\/span><strong>http:\/\/www.deutschlandfunk.de\/philosophie-in-der-digitalen-welt-digikant-oder-vier-fragen.1184.de.html?dram:article_id=342818<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Weyh assumes that quantum physicists believe that matter is constituted on a quantum level:<br \/>\n&#8220;Information can&#8217;t be just what we learn about the world. It can be what the world&#8217; does&#8217;. [&#8230;] When a photon is absorbed and thus&#8217; measured&#8217; &#8211; until its absorption it has no reality &#8211; an indivisible information bit is added to what we know about the world, and at the same time the information bit determines the structure of a small part of the world. It&#8217; creates&#8217; the reality of time and space of this photon&#8217;.<br \/>\nBased on this, he examines the four questions that Immanuel Kant posed in his lectures on logic in 1765 and extrapolates the answers to a period until 2050.<\/p>\n<p><em>What can I know?<\/em><br \/>\nEverything is accessible, but the crowd can only be mastered by machine. Science and citation is devalued. Information can no longer be validated, knowledge becomes timeless and boundless:&#8221;There are only agreements of truth with a moderate social bonding force: Whoever does not like an agreement, chooses another.&#8221; Conspiracy theories and pseudo-scientific explanations overgrow evidence-based approaches:&#8221;Thinking threatened to become anchorless until it was remembered that knowledge exists as an orientation power only where institutions provide secure fields of information and ignorance is resolutely excluded.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><em>What should I do?<\/em><br \/>\nIn the future, submission to technology and disclosure of data will be complete. Complementary to the abandonment of the concept of freedom, the controllability of legal norms increases<br \/>\n&#8220;But since in the digital universe, when one gave his liberty in payment in order to be politically effective through the registration of all actions, one received a system of appropriately graduated sanction possibilities free of charge.&#8221;<br \/>\nSo that the question can be answered:<br \/>\n&#8220;Give priority to one&#8217;s own only as long as it does not damage the general public. The advantage of the Second Enlightenment is that you get immediate feedback. While in the past one needed a moral sense of position &#8211; and often let it wither away &#8211; one now receives a position report, which informs one directly about one&#8217;s own wrong positions in society. And every disorder in the microstructure came back to be a disorder in the individual.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><em>What can I hope for?<\/em><br \/>\n&#8220;I can hope to become immortal. Since information is the foundation of our existence &#8211; &#8220;It from bit&#8221; &#8211; there can be no more death in the eternal record, only a deterioration of the biological carrier material.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><em>What is the human?<\/em><br \/>\n&#8221; The human being is based on information; knowing or not knowing it alone makes the difference.&#8221;<br \/>\nWeyh sees an inevitable development of the loss of man&#8217;s creator status:<br \/>\n&#8220;He went one step too far with digitization. She changed the human code in such a way that in the end man must lose his power, which he seemed to have gained through the machines in the meantime. He diffuses into an elusive entity, into a perhaps joyful we that can do without self.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 90px;\"><strong><span id=\"result_box\" lang=\"en\" tabindex=\"-1\">Let&#8217;s summarize: A gloomy prognosis, in which the existing attempts to evaluate information or to act with social media &#8211; including this website &#8211; only symptoms or transitional forms are up to this final stage.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Let&#8217;s ask an &#8220;expert&#8221;. What would Immanuel Kant say about the Internet? Markus Gabriel Interview: Kant und das Internet : Aufkl\u00e4rung braucht [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[12,14],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=173"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":177,"href":"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173\/revisions\/177"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.retrievaldreams.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}